Easy-to-follow video tutorials help you learn software, creative, and business skills.Become a member
In an earlier movie I mentioned how there is no universally agreed upon standard for naming typeface classifications, and the same is true of different font styles within a typeface family. There is no universally agreed upon standard. There are common terms, and usage, and these are some of them, but under your font style menu, you are likely to encounter a wide variety of different terminology and naming conventions. In a similar vein, I just wanted to point out that just because a typeface is called Garamond, or Caslon, or Helvetica, doesn't necessarily mean that one Garamond is going to look just like another, one Caslon is going to look just like another, because these typefaces are reinterpretations or revivals of an original, and they can vary quite markedly in that interpretation.
Here I have several different examples of Garamonds, and we can see that the width of them is quite markedly different, as are the letter forms themselves. Here I have a row of As, and there is quite some distinction between them. So in just the same way as a revival of a popular song will vary from one interpreter to another, so different interpretations of common typefaces will also vary.
Get unlimited access to all courses for just $25/month.Become a member
Access exercise files from a button right under the course name.
Search within course videos and transcripts, and jump right to the results.
Remove icons showing you already watched videos if you want to start over.
Make the video wide, narrow, full-screen, or pop the player out of the page into its own window.
Click on text in the transcript to jump to that spot in the video. As the video plays, the relevant spot in the transcript will be highlighted.
Your file was successfully uploaded.